Gobar Times
Cover Story

Dying beaches

   
  Beaches are fun. Lot of fun. The view of the ocean, the breeze, the shore and the sand —so calm and serene, right? Well, wait a minute. It’s all fine for us to take you into an imaginative, surreal world of bliss but the truth of the matter is that the 7500-kilometer long and narrow coastal strip of our country is one of its most fragile ecozones. To put it more bluntly, our beaches are dying. And there is so little we care to know (let alone do) about this harsh reality
 
Let’s begin with some important beach dynamics.

Beaches are rivers of sand
No, a beach is not just a lot of sand. “Beaches are rivers of sand”. How? Civil engineer by profession and President, PondiCAN by passion, Probir Banerjee explains, “Sea waves transport huge quantities of sand from north to south and south to north every year. During the southwest monsoon, some 600,000 cubic metres of sand is moved towards the north. Also, during the three months of the northeast monsoon (when winds are fierce), as much as 100,000 cubic metres of sand gets transported towards the south across the eastern coasts of the country.”

Yes, beaches are living creatures
Now we know that sand doesn’t remain static. It is brought in one season by winds and waves, and taken away the next season.

 THE KILLING LINK  

Ports: Interventions in the natural ecology of coasts. Did you know India’s coastline supports almost 30 per cent of the country’s population? And that we are the world’s 7th largest fishing nation? Given all the biodiversity gyaan, there is no denying that beaches provide economical development opportunities in the form of ports. “Ports along the peninsular coastline of India have suddenly become the cynosure of investor and public policy attention in India. But we neither understand the impact nor worry about dealing with the damage,” says Sudarshan Rodriquez from Tata Institute of Social Science, Mumbai.

As per the 11th five year plan of Government of India, 331 ports have been identified for development. What does this translate into? One port every 20 Kms
Economics of it
Ever since our country opened its doors to economical liberalisation, the port sector has witnessed many policy-related reforms. The domestic port sector has been opened up to private operators and the consequences are for all to witness. Corporate giants like POSCO and Mudra have been in the limelight for the worst possible reasons – destruction in the garb of development. The government has been pro privatisation of major Indian ports and has offered ‘concession agreements’ to the locals. What does this mean? Simple. State Governments offer complete freedom to private entreprenuers to develop numerous ports. What happens to the inhabitants? Well, no one seems to be bothered about this vital section of the population.
Roadmap to port reforms in the country is littered with many complex and befuddling issues, says Rodriguez. “There has been acute lacuna of well-researched information and case studies in port research in India. A few earlier attempts focused on the economic aspects of the Indian port sector, without examining the underlying environmental and social costs or planning issues that are inalienable.”
There are more than 2,000 active seaports throughout the world that cater to the requirements of seaborne cargo volume of around 5.3 billion tonnes. The volume of international seaborne trade in 2008 was estimated at 8.18 billion tonnes.
 CASE STUDIES  

1. Puducherry
Sunita Narain, Director General, Centre for Science and Environment, says, “A few years ago, Puducherry woke up to the reality that its harbour required to be rebuilt and contracts and concessions were awarded to transform it into a massive port (some 20 million tonnes annually). The citizens’ group, which was against the project, went to the court. But the developer – who, strangely, had no experience in ports, and built shops and malls – is not letting go. This is a sweet deal, which brings real estate benefits since the port concession package comes with cheap city land for cost recovery.”

What really happened?
■ The Puducherry Harbour, built in 1986, marked the beginning of devastating changes.
■ All Puducherry fishworkers are anticipated to be affected and over two lakh people have been constantly agitating against the construction of ports and harbours.
■ Fisherfolk see this as an excuse to usurp prime coastal land for low prices.
■ Construction of breakwaters and dredging for the port has already resulted in the accretion and erosion along different parts of the beach.
■ Veerampatnam, four hundred families out of a total of 1800 would lose their land. 75 per cent of the villagers are below the poverty line. Fisherfolk fear that their boats will be damaged and livelihoods would get jeopardised by the project.

My friend Jyoti Saikia and I started coming to Pondicherry two decades ago because of our connection to the
Aurobindo Ashram. And each time we visited, we fell more in love with this place. Jyoti remembers coming here as a teenager in 1971 and walking on the sandy beach. There was something magical about this town with her old world charm, her multicultural, multi-racial heritage and her perfect location vis-à-vis the Indian Ocean.

As I walk along the Promenade every morning, I can see the force with which the waves crash on the artificial seawall of rocks which keeps getting battered and somewhere deep down I sense a lack of urgency in addressing environmental degradation. On stormy days the waves make it impossible to walk on the road. In the absence of a sandy beach, the sea has nothing to hold it back. It wasn’t the same just 15 years ago.

Everyone in Pondicherry remembers the beach which just eroded in front of their very eyes. The common man does not know how it happened. That brings us to the question: Why a commercial port in the heart of an idyllic tourist town? Is that really required? Should develop - ment be at the cost of losing natural resources?

So what is the solution? As a resident of Pondicherry and as a part of heritage tourism, I would say that there should be a well planned infrastruc ture development for a balanced growth, keeping the inherent character of the town in mind. The coastline must be restored at any cost and if that means relocating the harbour and dropping all plans for the port, then so be it. There is one major advantage that Pondicherry has… she has citizens who care. Citizens who care for the environment, the people, and the aesthetic of the city.

* Kakoli is a resident of Pondicherry and a co-owner of GRATITUDE, a restored heritage home. She is an organic farmer, a social worker and a designer by profession.
2. Mundra (Gujarat)
■ Reclamation and destruction of
mangroves -560 hectares
■ 500 families dependent on fishing face the threat of losing their livelihoods as the port and jetties expand into their traditional fishing harbours
■ Dredging activities at the port and movement of barges and large shipping vessels affect fish catch
■ Destruction of nets
■ Obstruction of access
 
3. Gangavaram (Andhra Pradesh)
■ Displacement of over 3,600 families
■ People were unhappy with the compensation and rehabilitation package and demanded that the jetty
distance be reduced by 15 km.
■ New settlement homes much farther away from the sea
■ Concerns over dredging, siltation and the construction of breakwaters
■ Gangavaram fishers denied access to their traditional fishing grounds, compelling them to move towards
poor fishing grounds
■ Port inaugurated on July 12, 2009, despite ongoing protests and demands of the fishing community
 
4. Umargaon (Gujarat)
■ Wide scale protests by fisherfolk in early 2000
■ Displacement of fishing communities
■ Impact of harbour based fisheries on traditional fisherfolk
■ Destructions of highly profitable traditional fishing and agricultural area
■ Port-protester and activist Lt. Col. (Retd.) Pratap Save (55) dies. Save was allegedly beaten up by the police in custody on April 7, 2000, following a protest by villagers of the area against the survey work being
carried out for the port in Umargaon.
■ Protests led to the withdrawal of
UNOCAL- the promoter
 
Stakes are high and time is running out but the government is in no hurry to formulate strict policies or to ensure that they are followed. Coasts are our final frontiers. Can we afford to lose them?

25 per cent of India’s coastline is eroded
Coastal erosion of an appalling and irreparable magnitude is taking place because of ports, harbours and dams, coastal structures, commercial encroachments and sand mining.

Man-made structures: Plenty of problems
● Disturbs natural movement of sand
● Increases and accelerates erosion
● Transfers problem down the coast
● Continues forever as rocks keep sinking
● Changes the coastal ecosystems
● Hinders traditional fisher-folk

Adverse effects. What are the sources?
It is important for us to understand the sources of the destructive effects of ports on our beaches before we figure out how to beat the devil.

1. Location of the port: This determines the severity of impacts. Closer the port is to the beach, higher will be the erosion and greater will be the damage to the inhabitants.

2. Construction destruction: You do realise that construction activities for ports take place both in the offshore waters and on land. The most significant of this is construction of breakwaters or groynes, dredging (excavation activities), disposal of dredged materials, and transport of construction materials.

3. Operation activities: So what happens once ports are made? A lot! This includes ship traffic and discharges, cargo handling and storage, and land transport. Also, ship discharges and emissions, spills, leakages, waterfront industry discharges and land transport to and from the port. Just imagine the damage all this can cause.

■ Regulations: All mumbo jumbo?
Disclaimer: We are not responsible if you are not able to make head or tail of the coastal environmental regulations explained here on. It IS all very CONFUSING. Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) notification was issued under Environment Protection Act in 1991. The notification prohibits and regulates activities within 500 metres of ‘High Tide Line’ and has four categories:

a. CRZ 1: Ecologically fragile, minimum development allowed
b. CRZ II: Urban areas
c. CRZ III: Rural areas
d. CRZ IV: Andaman &Nicobar and Lakshadweep islands

● CRZ 1991 has been amended 25 times
● In 2008, the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) issued a draft Coastal Management Zone (CMZ) notification

CRZ-CMZ-CRZ-CMZ?
● In June 2009, MoEF set up a committee headed by Dr M S Swaminathan to review the committee on CMZ
● In July 2009, the committee submitted its report and recommended: “CMZ should be allowed to lapse. MoEF should strengthen the CRZ notification”.
● In April 2010, MoEF issued a pre-draft Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) 2010
● Now, consultations are ongoing and based on this, MoEF will issue a notification soon.

Close Encounters. How many ports?
India has 12 major ports and some experts are of the view that another 10 are required, considering the country’s economical growth prospects and anticipated foreign trade. However, the need of the hour is a more appropriate approach that addresses ports in the light of thier handling capacity and not numbers.
Not only is there a high density of notified minor ports along the coast (one every 33.3 km), but the distance between many of these ports is fairly small too. The table below shows the distance between select minor ports that are proposed for development and their adjacent ports. Gangavaram and Vishakapattinam are operational with a distance of only 14 km between them!