Gobar Times
Cover Story

Conflict Costs

When there is war at home...

Ahmadullah is 60 years old. He lives on top of a hill in the battle-ravaged Kabul, which is used as a launching pad for the hundreds of rockets that are fired into the city every time civil war breaks out in Afghanistan. But, Ahmadullah has learnt to live with bombs and missiles. His toughest ordeal, today, is to push his way through the big crowd that gathers in front of a tap, about 300 metres downhill, which supplies water (mixed with waste from the shelled sewers!) to more than 100 households, along with his own. It works for only a couple of hours a day, so if he misses his turn he is doomed. He has heard that his government’s plans to dig more supply wells are on hold, till the battle at the border and within it rages on.

But Ahmadullah is luckier than the 10-year-old Kamal al-Hamami and his family. Their home is in Gaza City in the West Bank, where running taps are now a distant memory. They have stopped showering and washing clothes. For drinking water, they race to a mosque — the one with a fountain — laden with containers, whenever there is a brief lull in the daily bombardment. In fact, all civic services — electricity, transport, health —- are on hold in this city, torn for years by epic conflicts between Israelis and Palestinians over land and other resources.

War rates
While human history has been dominated by wars, in the modern era, conflicts within nations has been rising rapidly since 1950. Between 1950 and 1960, there were eight major battles killing 1,000 people, annually. Between 1990 and 1995 there were 27. And the figures are skyrocketing, with Civil Wars becoming a scarily frequent phenomenon in the developing countries.

Wages of war
In these conflicts, the human costs are not the result of direct violence. They arise from the collapse of public services and the destruction of the economic and administrative structures of a nation. This, in turn, triggers hunger, forcing people to flee from their homes, to migrate... Let us take the example of the still-simmering offensives between Gaza and Israel. Here are some excerpts from leading international news dailies that speak not of deaths, but of human-inflicted conditions that make it impossible for a fellow human being to survive.

As Israel pressed its offensive in northern Gaza, as many as 90,000 residents have reportedly fled, and there is no real safe haven for them...

...During the daily three-hour lull in fighting, residents struggle to find food and other supplies in nearly-empty stores… most of the high-voltage lines bringing electricity from Israel into Gaza have been damaged, forcing hospitals to use generators for power…

Most of the bombings targeted buildings, farming and agricultural fields...

Growing numbers of Palestinians were fleeing their homes for makeshift shelters in schools, office buildings and a park as the Israeli army pressed its military campaign deeper into Gaza City…

The United Nations said that some 500,000 people still lack water…

No more fuel, benzene, gasoline, flour, wheat, sugar, rice, bread, candlelight and thousands of commodities are not available in Gaza. Add to that, continued power cuts up to 20 hours during the cold weather of winter…

“In Gaza, the very foundation of society is being destroyed: people’s homes, civic infrastructure, public health facilities and schools”, says the United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon. And thousands of people are being displaced.

“What began as very small, isolated numbers is now turning into a torrent,” says Aidan O’Leary, deputy director for the UN agency that deals with Palestinian refugees.

The choice is clear. People can either stay and die, or migrate to other regions, within or outside their country borders, adding to the ever-increasing list of war refugees and internally displaced persons (IDPs).

Displaced by war

Refugees are people who have fled their country because they fear persecution or danger. So, war refugees are those people who have fled a war or a conflict in their home country.

Internally displaced persons (IDPs) are people who are forced to flee their homes during wars or conflicts but, unlike refugees, remain within their home country’s borders.

The Casualty Count
Top 10 Countries of Origin (As of 1 January 2007)
Country Refugees
    Afghanistan 2,108,000   
    Iraq 1,451,000   
    Sudan 6,86,000   
    Somalia 4,64,000   
    DR Congo 4,02,000   
    Burundi 3,97,000   
    Viet Nam 3,74,000   
    Turkey 2,27,000   
    Angola 2,07,000   
    Myanmar 2,03,000    

 

 

  • At the beginning of 2007, the number of people of concern to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) was a record 32.9 million. (See pie chart)
  • The figure of 32.9 million represents a 56 per cent increase compared to the previous year.
  • The global refugee population increased, from 8.7 million to 9.9 million, mainly because of the growth of the Iraqi refugee population in neighbouring countries to an estimated 1.2 million (a number that had climbed to well over 2 million by September 2007).
  • In addition to Iraq, in 2006 there were significant new outflows of refugees from the Central African Republic (31,000), Chad (20,000), Sri Lanka (16,600), Sudan (14,400), and Somalia (13,600).
  • Afghanistan remained the top refugee-producing country with 2.1 million Afghan refugees still spread over more than 70 asylum countries (20per cent of the entire global refugee population).
  • At the beginning of 2007, the total number of conflict-related IDPs worldwide was estimated at 24.5 million.
  • Asia hosted around 45per cent of all the ‘people of concern’ to UNHCR (15 million), followed by Africa with 30per cent (9.7 million), Latin America with 10per cent (3.5 million), Europe with 10per cent (3.4 million), North America with 3.5per cent (1.1 million), and Oceania with 0.2per cent (85,500).

Source: UNHCR


The displaced people are in a very vulnerable situation. They have no protection from their own countries. Often, their own governments threaten to persecute them. And there is no surety that other countries would let them in, and help them once they are in. But, is migration the only option left to the people living in war-ridden countries? Yes, it is. These people migrate because wars destroy everything – their shelters, infrastructures and cultivable lands, and their sources of livelihood.

The process of destruction
Cultivated lands and resources which generate income for the locals are the most-favoured targets, a a deadly tool in warfare. The objective is environmental damage for its own sake, denying habitat to the people living on and earning from those lands.

Crops, fields and fruit-bearing trees have always been targetted. For instance, during the American Revolutionary War (1779), General George Washington directed his troop to destroy Iroquois Indians’ “entire corn crop... [and] fruit orchards were cut down”.

In the ongoing Gaza war, agricultural and farming fields are constantly being bombarded. Eastern agricultural lands in Gaza City, fields near Al Buarij Refugee Camp in mid of Gaza Strip, in Bait Hanon town, near Khoza’a town, in Absan area of Khan Yonis City, in Al Zaytoun area, and other such fertile tracts of lands have already been ravaged.

It is not only agricultural fields that are under fire, but also houses, schools, hospitals, roadways, airports, water and sewage systems, fuel stations, industries and factories. Gaza’s airport, targets around Al Khozndar gas station, Dar Al Arqam school in the east of Gaza City, and water tanks in Al Zaytoun area have all been severely hit. Even parts of the key street Slah el din have been bombed, causing deep holes on the ground hindering the movement of cars from and into the city.

And Gaza is not the only example. Any country, which has ever faced a war, can paint the same grim picture. During the Persian Gulf War (1991), for instance, industrial production units, and water and sanitation infrastructure were destroyed. Nuclear facilities and various weapons production and storage sites were bombed, and oil-fires were set ablaze, spewing hazardous materials into the environment.

Afghanistan
In October 2001, the United States waged the ‘War on terrorism’ on Afghanistan, which continues even today. It is estimated that ten thousand villages, and their surrounding environments have been destroyed. Most of the landmines are on agricultural lands, which provide three-quarters of the country’s income. Food production has become dangerous and difficult.

Many landmines have been placed in the small canals, which are used to irrigate farmlands. So, farmers cannot use the water for fear of detonating an explosive. Thus, farmers are shifting to the “safer” option of growing opium poppies, which require less land and water. Even the forest cover of the country has reduced to less than 2 per cent, due to illegal timber trading by Taliban members and US bombings.

Basic infrastructure, such as roads, bridges, irrigation, canals, telecommunications, and electricity are damaged or inadequate. Most people lack proper nutrition, housing, clothing, and medical care. It has been reported that only 25 per cent of the urban population, and 12 per cent rural population, have access to improved sanitation facilities. Only 6 per cent of the population has access to electricity.

Safe drinking water has declined, as water infrastructure has been destroyed, resulting in leaks, bacterial contamination and water theft. Rivers and groundwater are also contaminated. As a result, more than 65 per cent of the population in urban areas and 81per cent in rural areas do not have access to safe water. This has lead to various health problems and lowered agricultural output.

Iraq
The war in Iraq, launched in 2003 by the United States as part of the ‘War on Terrorism’, has caused enormous environmental damage. For example, military movements and weapon application have degraded the lands, especially the agricultural fields. Some weapons used in the war, such as white phosphorus ammunition, have left indelible imprints on Iraq’s natural resources, and continues to do the damage.

Lands are also taken away from inhabitants for military purposes. There are a number of cases where land was converted into “national sacrifice zones”, examples of “ecofascism”. For instance, in the American West immense tracts of land in New Mexico, Arizona, and surrounding states were taken for military purposes, even though the land was highly valued by its indigenous American Indian tribal inhabitants.

Frequent bombing has damaged the sanitation structures and sewage treatment systems. The destruction of military and industrial machinery also releases heavy metals and other harmful substances. Oil trenches are being burnt, as was the case in the Gulf War of 1991, severely polluting the air in the surrounding regions. In Northern Iraq, a sulphur plant burned for an entire month! The groundwater and all surface water bodies, including River Tigris, are contaminated by these residues of war.

One particularly shocking incident was the theft of two hundred blue plastic containers storing uranium from a nuclear power plant located in the south of Baghdad. The radioactive content of the barrels was dumped in rivers and the barrels were rinsed out. The poor, living in adjacent areas, then used these to store water, oil and tomatoes, or sold them to others. Even milk was transported to other regions in these barrels.

Lebanon
More than 1,200 people were killed, 4,400 injured, and over 9,00,000 people fled their homes in the war between Lebanon and Israel in 2006. An estimated 30,000 housing units were destroyed or badly damaged. There was widespread destruction of roads, bridges and overpasses. The Beirut airport and seaports were bombed. Lebanon’s water supply and sewage networks were damaged. Large tracts of productive agricultural land have become “out of bounds” for farmers.

In Africa, warring groups shoot elephants and rhinos for illegally trading ivory. They deplete diamond mines and cut valuable tropical timber stands above recovery rates, all in order to raise quick cash for personal enrichment, sustenance of the troops, and to finance arms supplies.

South Vietnam’s lobster industry was also wrecked by over-production to provide this delicacy for American soldiers. The tiger population was similarly slaughtered for souvenir trade.

Africa
The entire continent bears battle scars. Civil wars; pitched battles between neighbouring countries; and colonisers fighting over its treasure trove of natural resource, Africa has witnessed it all.

Eritrea (1961-1993, 1997-2000) – The war produced over 7,50,000 refugees, and destroyed the entire infrastructure of the region. Severe drought led to famine, and the government estimated that after the war only 60 per cent of the country received adequate food supplies. Landmines were placed on fields, making farming and herding — the primary livelihood of the local communties — activities fraught with extreme risks. There is a possibility that the landmines may get washed into cities during floods, as has happened in Mozambique.

Sudan (Darfur and Chad) – During the Sudanese civil war, thousands of people became refugees and productive farmlands in the southern region were abandoned. Extreme droughts caused a widespread famine, beginning in 1983, which killed more than 95,000 people. As the distraught farmers started claiming more and more land and bringing them under cultivation, routes used by herders were closed off.

Sri Lanka
The country’s economy is primarily based on agriculture. Twenty years of civil war has crippled the economy, and have had a direct influence on the people’s lives. Buildings, vegetation, crops, and agricultural lands have been destroyed. Almost all essential items, including food, fuel, medicines, and building materials are in very short supply. Rebel attacks are generally triggered just before the harvest time of the main rice crop or immediately after sowing. This has deprived people of the essential food crop, besides ruining the land and water supply.

Forests, used as hiding and training grounds by the militants, have borne the brunt of the decades-long strifes. This, in turn, has affected the domesticated species of plants, particularly food plants. Some rebel groups also engage in or aid illegal logging of timber, as a source of revenue.

Chemical residues from bombs and shells and biological pollutants from faecal material and carcasses have polluted the underground water. Given the number of wells in the Peninsula (virtually every house has one well), the potential for pollutants to spread over a large area is very high.

In the seas, naval battles and underwater attacks have caused the death of marine life, disruption of the seabed and localised pollution by chemicals and fuel oil. This has hit the livelihood of the fisherfolk.

There has also been large scale clearing of mangroves in many areas of the north and the east to deny shelter and protection for the Tamil resistance forces.This has affected the population sizes of many fish species, prawns and migratory birds, who use the mangroves as breeding grounds.

No wonder, therefore, that the number of Sri Lankan migrant workers has grown tremendously in recent years. Inadequate employment opportunities, combined with poor living conditions, and the critical political situation are some of the main factors behind this migration.

Trouble in paradise
One of the starkest examples of such war casualties is in our own country — Kashmir. The valley has been the battleground for India and Pakistan since ages. Its agriculture and tourism industries have been wrecked by wars. Thousands of people have been forced to migrate to other states and regions, as in other war-stricken countries of the world.

But, refugees searching for safe haven can prove to be an almost unbearable burden on environment. In their own country or in the nation providing asylum.

Shifting effects
Refugees and displaced people jostle for space in regions, which are already reeling under the burden of overpopulation. This puts enormous pressure on lands, water bodies, and on urban services. So, large scale migration inevitably leads to all kinds of environmental evils — deforestation, draining of wetlands, nutrient depletion, overflowing urban centres, over-fishing along coastal areas, and so on.

For example, during the Vietnam War, starving hill tribes were forced to turn from chemically contaminated rice fields to the forests for survival. As a result, logging for cash, land clearing and disappearance of endemic plant and animal species skyrocketed.

While the battle is on, the victims — thrown out of their homes — seek refuge and livelihood elsewhere. After the war ends, their return to their original homes is difficult, as the damages are too dire to heal.

So let there be PEACE?
Sporadic or frequent outbreak of violence, which is known as ‘war’, takes a heavy toll. And correct assessment of environmental changes wrought by a battle is an issue of political debate and scientific fieldwork. But, the most alarming truth today is not about these localised outbursts, but about the war that mankind is mindlessly waging against the Planet. Incessantly. Yes, do you know the most damaging impact on the environment is delivered not by war but by peacetime commerce?

The real offensive
Sounds absurd? Then consider this:

  • During the Gulf War, for the 28-day period from 16 May to 12 June 1991.
  • The amount of oil consumed by the Kuwaiti fires amounted to about the US daily oil import (and consumption).
  • The heat output was equivalent to a 500-acre forest fire, which is an annual event in the US.
  • The particulate emission was equal to about 10 per cent of the daily-emitted worldwide biomass burning.
  • The carbon dioxide releases were equal to about 2 per cent of daily worldwide releases; and
  • Sulphur dioxide releases were equal to nearly 60 per cent of daily US electric utilities emissions.

In a nutshell, the harm done in those 28 days was much less than what happened elsewhere around the world on a daily basis. This proves that rapacious peacetime commerce is more harmful to the environment than wars.

The verdict is clear. It is human activity that destroys nvironment. It also destroys the lives of Ahmadullah, Kamal-al Hamami and millions of victims around the world. War is only one of the many destructive activities that the human race engages in...

 

Slider Heading: 
Conflict Costs