line003.jpg (628 bytes)

     Gobar Times: Environment for Beginners

line_01.jpg (801 bytes)

plus.jpg (487 bytes)
HOME a_sing.jpg (434 bytes)
COVER STORY a_sing.jpg (434 bytes)
POSTER a_sing.jpg (434 bytes)
EDITORIAL a_sing.jpg (434 bytes)
ASK ME a_sing1.jpg (429 bytes)
LETTERS a_sing1.jpg (429 bytes)
COWPATS a_sing1.jpg (429 bytes)
OPEN FORUM a_sing.jpg (434 bytes)
LIFE CYCLE a_sing.jpg (434 bytes)
ARCHIVES a_sing.jpg (434 bytes)
Ask me! No?

 

 

 

C O V E R  S T O R Y

N O W H E R E  T O  G OT

Line Callout 1 (No Border): Till twelve years ago, Kucheipadar used to be sleepy tribal village in the Kashipur block in Rayagadh district of Orissa. Then the villagers launched a battle against a cluster of industry heavyweights—the Utkal Alumina International Limited (UAIL). The UAIL had just begun to install rigs to source the rich bauxite reserves found in this region. But the villagers set up roadblocks, braving lathi charges, and stopped the juggernaut from rolling into their land. The Kashipur block still exists in a state of siege.
 

Why are the tribals so desperate? Because they have witnessed the trauma of being ‘displaced’ from really close quarters. Since Independence, dams and mining industries have come to cover more than 5,00,000 hectares of land in Koraput region alone in Orissa. The story is the same in most other parts of this mineral-rich state. Result? Thousands of tribal families who used to live in and around the forests (now turned into mining sites) land up in city slums. The story gets even gorier.

More than 100 families living in the vicinity of the Hirakud dam—once considered to be the ‘pride of Orissa’—have attained the status of being ‘thrice displaced’!!! First by the dam, and then by Eastern India Collieries, and then again by the National Thermal Power Corporation.

Lets take another instance.
57,000 Tongas from Zambia and Zimbabwe had to make way for the Kariba dam in late 1950s. “Everything was buried by the water and soldiers were sent to kill our people who did not want to move,“ says Chief David Syankusule. The dam today provides electricity to millions of city dwellers in Harare, Lusaka and beyond. But for the Tongas the dam has spelt doom. Before it was built they had access to clean water from the fast-flowing River Zambezi. Then they were relocated to rockier, less fertile land, from where they had to travel five kms to fetch water from man-made lakes. The ‘displacement’ has left a lasting impact. Even today, the Tonga children suffer from diseases like bilahazaria and malaria, thanks to living in such close proximity to stagnant water. “Their bodies are sick and thin, and they are running out of blood,” laments Syankusule.

The Tongas in Africa and the tribals in Rayagadh have problems in common. The lives of both these communities have been dramatically and permanently affected by changes in natural environment — their original homeland. Both are environmental refugees.

Who are they?
The term was first coined in 1985 by Essam El-Hinnawi, an Egyptian professor at the National Research Centre, Cairo. He divided them into three categories:

‘Natural’ refugees: Those who have been temporarily displaced from their habitat due to natural disasters like earthquakes, floods, cyclones, or yes…I know what you are thinking…a tsunami!

Driven out for development: Those who have been forced to leave their home and hearth because these have been destroyed by man-made constructions like dams, roads, or some urban development projects. In Indonesia almost 50,000 people became refugees so that the roads in and around Jarkarta could be widened. 15,000 had to abandon their homes for the sake of building a modern, state-of-the art sewerage system in Shanghai…

Forced to migrate: Those who have migrated from the land that they were born in because it can no longer sustain them.

Every year, in Maharashtra, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Andhra Pradesh and every other state of India, thousands of poor farmers are forced to push their way into crowded, unwelcoming towns and cities simply because they cannot make a living out of their land any more. For some, the water source — a well or a lake or even a river — has dried up due to over use. For others, the once fertile farmlands have turned barren due to water logging or salinisation. And for the rest, who never owned a piece of land, but survived by grazing animals in the village commons — those lands have been declared off limits. They have been grabbed by the richer, more powerful farmers in the village, or given away by the government to an industry or a dam project or a mining plant.

There is one factor that is common among all three categories of environmental refugees. They belong to the economically, socially, and politically weakest and most vulnerable sections of the population.

Lets take India as an example again. Adivasis or the tribals form only eight per cent of our total population. But they make up 40 to 50 per cent of those displaced by development projects in our country!!!

And, interestingly, this is true of even for the first category of environmental refugees — the ones evicted due to natural calamities. The number of people killed or rendered homeless due to natural calamities are far higher in the low and middle-income countries as compared to the high income nations. This is because of a number of factors. In the developing countries


icon.gif (72 bytes) Next Page

1 2 3 4

small_aline.jpg (496 bytes)