Firm on shaky ground
Who can forget the killer Tsunami that hit the Asian coastlines on December 26, 2004? But
from the resulting ruins, a sliver of hope shone through in Nias - a small island 120
kilometres west of the Indonesian archipelago. About 80 per cent of the modern houses on
Nias collapsed but traditional houses remained standing.
The dancing island
Nias, lying on the fracture zone of the Eurasian and Indo-Australian tectonic plates, is
shaken by earthquakes regularly. The regional architecture has many special elements that
make buildings resistant to earthquakes. Like the foundations and the elevation with
unique and complex arrangement of vertical and diagonal columns. If the buildings are
maintained well they can last over generations and withstand strong seismic shocks. Even
if damage occurs, the threat to life is not as high because the wooden constructions are
light.
The Nias example is not the only one. Traditional houses in many regions are built to
resist natural disasters - floods, quakes and cyclones. What structural techniques make
these buildings so strong?
Kashmir
Earthquakes have occurred regularly over centuries in
Kashmir and people have learnt to live with it. Two old construction systems known as taq
and dhajji-dewari exist here side-by-side and both have tested quake-resistant features.
Dhajji-dewari: the name literally means a 'patch quilt wall.' This
technique uses timber and bricks but is quite different from modern brick construction. A
framework of timber is made which is then filled with burnt clay bricks. This creates a
patchwork of small panels made up of brick masonry and surrounded by timber elements.
Presence of timber studs gives a sturdy framework and divides the brickwork into small
sections. As a result the individual sections resist shaking and this prevents destruction
of the wall. Dhajji-dewari system is often used for walls of upper stories, especially for
the gable portion of the wall, even when the walls in bottom stories could be made of
brick or stone masonry.
Taq: this system also uses timber and brick or stonework but is different
from dhajji-dewari because it does not have any frames. Taq consists of heavy thick walls
bonded together with large horizontal timber. The wood ties the walls together with the
floors.
These traditional construction styles use clay instead of mortar, which gives elastic
bonding to the brick and are well suited for the quake zones. The most recent trembler on
October 8, 2005, once again proved this, as most of these houses escaped unscathed.
Kutch,
Gujarat
Bhongas are found in the Kutch district of Gujarat. A bhonga is a single cylindrically
shaped room, with a conical roof. The design technique is 200 years old. The walls are
made of mud blocks while the roof is generally thatched. While locally available soft
stone is chiselled into rectangular blocks for walls, timber and bamboo are used for roof.
Kutch has a very high earthquake risk and the circular shape of the wall helps to resist
horizontal shaking. The roofing materials are generally very light. Even in case of a roof
collapse its low weight ensures that the occupants are unharmed. The conical roof of a
Bhonga is supported at its crest by a vertical central wooden post, which reduces the
roof-load on the walls. Very few bhongas experienced any significant damage even in the
area around the epicenter during the Bhuj earthquake in 2001 that measured 7.6 on the
Richter's scale. Floods, slides and quakes
We all know landslides are a regular feature in the Northeastern region. And Assam, of
course, is chronically flood-prone. It is also a seismically active zone. People here have
used the locally available materials like mud, straw, grass, reeds and timber to build
their homes.
The most
common type of dwellings is the stilted house built on a raised platform made from bamboo
strips. Bamboo beams are placed diagonally, under the floor as bracing to reduce the sway.
A typical Assamese house differs slightly as it has a mud foundation. The walls of these
houses are cheap and employ simple construction methods and are called ekra walls. A
framework of vertical posts is set in the ground and split reeds or bamboo are woven to
form a lattice. Mud is applied to this framework to make a thin wall. All the structures
are tied together with ropes or wires tied to keep the unit together. Ekra walls have less
mass and are flexible so they can survive earthquakes and cyclones.
Now let's take stock. These homes have helped us to explode some age-old myths.
Myth 1 - concrete buildings are stronger than those made
of wood, mud or bamboo. Now, that is a hollow claim. After all people have used natural
building materials since they began to build. Cement began to be used only in 1824.
Remains of the earliest villages that date back to 9000 BC, at Shanidar on the
Turkish-Iranian border, show that the buildings were made of mud and reeds. Even today
half the world's population live in houses made of locally available materials like
bamboo, stone, grass, wood, lime and mud. Mud is the most widely used material. Different
societies have used it in different ways and have given the techniques different names -
adobe, chika, cob, sod, cajon and our own kacha. Mud houses are cool in summer and warm in
winter.
Myth 2 - concrete is a modern and therefore better alternative.
We know that modern houses require a lot of energy to be made habitable. But apart from
that a typical modern house has hidden costs too. To understand this we must see what goes
into making one.
Burnt bricks, cement, iron, aluminium and marble are the most common construction
materials. Each of these items consume enegy, as walls or roofs are made out of them. This
is called the embodied energy of buildings. I have already told you about the high
production cost of cement. Materials like bricks also require large amounts--for
extracting and firing of clay. Transportation costs vary according to how heavy the
material is and how far it has been moved. For instance, marble imported from Italy will
have caused more energy consumption than stone bought from a local quarry. So the entire
process - from production to utilisation - for each component contributes hugely to land,
air and water pollution. It has been estimated that 22 per cent of green house gas
emissions is contributed by the construction sector in India. Low energy materials are
less polluting. So natural materials like timber, stone and mud will have low embodied
energy and houses made of these have lesser running costs.
Old and new
At some point of architectural evolution, we seem to have forgotten the basic logic that
was used to make the first houses. When design complemented the climate and the materials
were easily and locally available. Some traditional and rural dwellings still preserve
this logic. We can lern from that. But this certainly does not mean that we should
completely revert to old forms of construction. What we need is a healthy mix of the
traditional and the modern. A combination of old wisdom and new building science.
One way to reduce resource consumption and construct buildings that have less embodied
energy is to use recycled materials. There are some new and very innovative experiments in
using building materials like - straw bales, crushed concrete, telegraph poles and car
radiators. The people of Tilonia in Rajasthan have experimented by using old farming
equipment to build. Straw bales - a waste product of mechanical farming - is a cheap and
low energy alternative. Just like the 'three little pigs', straw bales were used to build
houses in the plains of North America more than a century ago. These houses still stand.
The bales are waste straw that would otherwise be burned, adding to pollution in the air.
But as building material they have low embodied energy and provide great insulation.
In India, the eminent architect, Laurie Baker, has used mud as primary material to
construct new houses. He swears by mud, and insists that it can be used for large-scale
mass housing schemes-as it can be found everywhere and is almost free. |