Leftovers from Ice AgeGHGs
whats the source?
All this sounds pretty familiar, right? Even though we have been talking in the future
tense, the world already seems to be in the throes of this catastrophe!
Are we prepared to deal with this crisis? Have we, the global community, taken some
steps already? But before we take stock of that, lets find out a little more about the
main culpritsthe greenhouse gases.
GHGs are produced by carbon-based fossil fuels like coal, gas and
oil. And as we all know, these are the fuels which run factories, cars and power stations
around the world. In other words, they drive the economy of every country in this planet!
Scientists trace the phenomenon of glacial retreat to the Industrial Revolution, which
began around 1760. Before the industrial era (1750-1800) the CO2 concentration
in the Earths atmosphere was 280 ppm (parts per million) and today it is around 375
ppm. Add to this the presence of the other GHGs and you can begin to gauge how explosive
the situation really is.
Warm terms
Kyoto Protocol A rulebook signed and adopted under
the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in 1997 in the CoP in
Kyoto, Japan. It laid down a timetable for industrialised countries to reduce their GHG
emissions.
The UNFCCC is a global effort to combat global warming
and the Conference of Parties (CoP) comes under this institution; it consists of 150
member countries that have ratified or approved the convention. For details, log on to www.gobartimes.org and refer November 2002 issue. |
The belching rich
Also, the richer a country, the more it emits. Because, the use of fossil fuels is,
unfortunately, closely linked with economic growth and lifestyle. As a nation grows more
prosperous, its consumption of fuel for transport, power generation and various
other so-called necessities of life zooms up, too.
So, in todays world, any limit on carbon emissions
amounts to a limit on economic growth. No wonder the ongoing interna-tional negotiations
under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change ( UNFCCC) see box on Warm Terms)
aimed at cutting down GHG emissions have turned into a tug of war between
the developed (read rich) and the developing nations (ranging from middle-class to poor).
While the rich are unwilling to tone down their lifestyle, countries in the opposite camp
refuse to take on emission cut at their current stage of development.
But most
importantly,
We, that is, the entire global community, must no longer allow carbon-based
fuelspetrol, diesel, coalto drive our lives. Research, policy-making, business
dealsall must be done with only one aim in mind: reinventing the worlds energy
system. To cut down emissions and to focus on renewable sources. It is really a matter of
life and death. Not only for the mighty glaciers but for the tiniest organism that lives
in this planet.
 |
Developing countries like India, are demanding their
space to grow. Asking them to reduce carbon emissions now, amounts to asking
them to freeze their standards of living as they stand today. This, in fact, amounts to
freezing global inequality. Because, in that case, some countries will always be more
developed than the rest. Why should they accept that?, Especially since the Unites States
the largest emitter of them all still refuses to make a firm commitment to
cut its use of carbon-based fuels.
So the stalemate continues. But the heat is on. Not only
on the glaciers, but on every living organism in this planet. What can be the way out of
this carbonmess?
The richer nations must take more responsibility, and cut
down carbon use drastically. Because in a way, global warming is their creation. Every
human being in this planet has an equal right to atmosphere, and the people in these
countries have used more than their share of absorptive capacity. Just sample this. In
early 1990s (when the world community first began to pay heed to the alarm signals) the
GHG emission of one US citizen was equal to 19 Indians, 30 Pakistanis, 17 Maldivians and
107 Bangladeshis!
Since the Earths cleansing capacity belongs to
every human being on Earth, the carbon sinks must be divided among them equally. So the
sinks, specially the oceans, which do not belong to any particular country,
but are common property of mankind should be apportioned on the basis of the
countrys share of population. This would encourage the developing countries to cut
emissions too, but on their own terms...
|